Advance publication
Res judicata in International Arbitration: Case Studies and Principles
Published 22 February 2012
Introduction
The issue of res judicata arises more often than one might think in international arbitration. Indeed, the author has been involved in numerous arbitrations where a party has relied on submissions, evidence, or decisions from a related or parallel arbitration.
This article presents two case studies where the issue of res judicata arose. It explains how the issue was dealt with in those cases, and subsequently reviews some of the principles that one may look to when considering this issue.
The author does not presume to have answers to all of the questions that this issue raises. These case studies and principles are simply presented as material upon which one might draw when confronted with this issue depending upon the circumstances of the case.
Case Studies: Telesat Canada v. Boeing; Western European Oil Company v. Eastern European Oil Company
Other recently published material:
-
Commentary on the US Solicitor General’s Office (CVSG) brief in BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina (May 2013)
(16 May 2013) -
Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (Hege Elisabeth Kjos) - Book review
(16 May 2013) -
Arbitrator and Counsel: The Double-Hat Dilemma
(23 April 2013) -
Expropriatory and Non-Expropriatory Takings Under International Investment Law
(9 April 2013) -
Judicial Review of Foreign-Related Arbitral Awards in China: Statutory Provisions, Perceived Defects and Suggested Innovations
(9 April 2013)
Complete listing of Advance publication.
