Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna (dissenting opinion)
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, ruling 7-1 that an arbitrator rather than a court should decide a claim that a contract containing an arbitration clause is void for illegality.
To download this document you need to be a subscriber
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!
If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here