Content Join OGEMID
 
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Transnational Dispute Management

Skip navigation

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

Join OGEMID

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About TDM
    4. About TDM
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & r docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • Audiovisual library AV library
    1. Home
    2. Audiovisual library
    3. Audiovisual Library
    4. Audiovisual Library
    5. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    6. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    7. Conference presentations
    8. Conference presentations
  • OGEMID OGEMID
    1. Home
    2. OGEMID
    3. About OGEMID
    4. About OGEMID
    5. Suggest a topic
    6. Suggest a topic
    7. Guest programme
    8. Guest programme
    9. Seminar programme
    10. Seminar programme
    11. Browse archive
    12. Browse archive
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Join
    16. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

Aura Energy Limited v Sweden - Claim for Damages Under the Energy Charter - Union Law and European Law - 4 November 2019

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Australia
  • Sweden
Year

2019

Summary

Excerpt

Dear Sirs,

RE. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES UNDER THE ENERGY CHARTER, UNION LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW

1. We, the undersigned counsels, act for and on behalf of Aura Energy Limited, registered office and principal place of the company is Level 1, 34-36 Punt Road, Windsor Victoria Australia 3181 (the "Claimant" or the "Investor").

2. The Claimant is direct owner of the Swedish limited liability company Vanadis Battery Metals AB (former trade name Energy Sweden AB) (the "SPV") for its Swedish mining activities/businesses. The Claimant represents 100 % of all the total investment in the SPV.

3. Overall information on the Swedish uranium mining projects of the Investor (developed in the name of the SPV):

4. Kinderåsen Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Kinderâsen 1 in the municipality of Berg in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2020-02-02. It shall be noted that the municipality of Berg opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

5. Häggån Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Häggån in the municipality of Berg and Åre respectively in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2022-08-22. It shall be noted that the municipality of Berg opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

6. Bölåsen Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Bolasen 1 in the municipality of Berg and Åre respectively in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2020-02-02. It shall be noted that the municipality of Berg opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

7. Skallböle Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Skallböle 1 in the municipality of Berg and Åre respectively in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2019-01-20. It shall be noted that the municipality of Berg opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

8. Möckelåsen Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Möckelåsen 1 in the municipality of Berg and Åre respectively in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2019-01-20. It shall be noted that the municipality of Are opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

9. Koborgsmyren Uranium Project: An exploration permit for Molybden (and thereby covering all minerals set out in Chapter 1 § 1 in the Minerals Act) is granted for the specific area Koborgsmyren 1 in the municipality of Berg in the county of Jämtland. The permit is valid until 2019-01-23. It shall be noted that the municipality of Berg opposed to granting the SPV the permit.

10. The Investor has successfully developed, and continue to operate, a number of mining projects globally. The investments in the Sweden were made with regard to the favourable investment conditions for the uranium mining industry that existed in Sweden prior to 1 August 2018, and which could have been reasonably expected to last for a number of years to come. At the time of the events giving rise to the claim, the Investor owned a number of large uranium mining projects in Sweden.

11. The conflict between the Investor and the Swedish government was triggered by the summer 2018 decision of the Swedish Parliament to phase-out/ban uranium prospection and/or exploration in Sweden. It was the culmination of an intensive and controversial public debate driven by the green activists regarding inter alia uranium mining. Due to the measures taken by Sweden as per 1 August 2018, the Investor has been deprived of the benefit of its Swedish Uranium projects.

12. The new act adopted in Sweden as from 1 August 2018 was a complete game changer. All mining of uranium in Sweden was as from such period in time outlawed. The ban also applies to processing of residual uranium in existing tailings, and processing of uranium unearthed in conjunction with extraction of other minerals, e.g. iron, base metals and rare earth elements.

13. The Claimant alleges that its claim arises from a dispute under the Energy Charter ("ECT") article 26, and the European Union law and the European Convention of Human Rights.

14. The Claimant qualifies as an investor under ECT. The ECT protects the Claimant's investments in Sweden. All of the acts complained of occurred after the ECT entered into force for Sweden. Claimant's investments fall clearly within the definition of "Investment" in Art. 1(6) ECT.

15. These measures by Sweden have been taken, in the Investor's opinion, in a non- transparent and chaotic manner, undermining the Investor's reliance on Sweden and precluding any reasonable business planning. The contested measures: (i) were radical and unexpected, (ii) violated the legitimate expectations of the Investor, (iii) violated the obligation of Sweden to ensure stable and predictable legal and economic framework for long-term investments in the mining sector, (iv) violated the obligations of Sweden of transparency and candour towards the Investor, (v) were not taken in public interest, and indeed, they were taken against Sweden's legitimate public interest, (vi) were arbitrary, (vii) did not follow due process; (viii) were disproportionate, (ix) were discriminatory, and (x) they were not accompanied by the prompt, adequate and effective compensation.

[...]

... The prohibited conduct includes:
- Actions that violate an investor's legitimate expectations in relation to the investment;
- Conduct that creates an unstable or unpredictable legal framework or business environment for the investment;
- Conduct that violates due process or results in a "denial of justice," including (but not limited to) improper judicial or administrative proceedings as well as governmental interference in such proceedings;
- Interference with a contractual relationship;
- Actions that treat an investor or an investment inconsistently, ambiguously, or with a lack of transparency;
- Failure to sufficiently notify an investor in advance of impending acts that will impact the investment;
- Actions that are discriminatory;
- Harassment or coercive conduct; and

[...]

29. The Claimant hereby invites you to negotiations regarding the claim.

Stockholm 4th of November 2019

[...]

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

TDM Call for Papers: Old and New Disputes in Aerospace Law

Prof. Yun Zhao and Dr. J. Górski

  • Prof. ZHAO Yun
  • Dr. Jedrzej Gorski

TDM Call for Papers: The Future of Investment Law in Latin America

Dr. Sébastien Manciaux and Francisco Victoria-Andreu

  • Sebastien Manciaux
  • Francisco Victoria-Andreu

TDM Call for Papers: Islamic Finance and Dispute Resolution

Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzman

  • Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzman

Invitation to write: Overlap between Bankruptcy / Insolvency Proceedings and Arbitrations

TDM Editorial Team

Transnational Dispute Management

TDM Call for Papers: The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA)

J. Chaisse, J. Górski, E. Laryea, M.M. Mbengue, and K. Olaoye

  • Prof. Julien Chaisse
  • Dr. Jedrzej Gorski
  • Prof. Emmanuel Laryea
  • Prof. Makane Moïse Mbengue
  • Kehinde Olaoye

TDM Call for Papers: International Investment and Competition Law in AND with the Global South

Prof. Leila Choukroune and Anu Monga

  • Prof. Leila Choukroune
  • Anu Monga
  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

COVID-19: Complicating Contractual Performance

20 Jan 2021

S. Salwi

  • S. Salwi

Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes in India

18 Jan 2021

A. Solanki, A. Tanwar

  • A. Solanki
  • A. Tanwar

Africa's Investment Treaty Practice with China: Are the Africa-China BITs Conducive to the Implementation of the AU Agenda 2063?

8 Jan 2021

G.M. Zagel

  • G.M. Zagel
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGEMID, the leading on-line discussion platform for international dispute resolution?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Transnational Dispute Management Journal (TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) and OGEMID listserv focus on recent developments in the area of (investment) arbitration and dispute management, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About TDM

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL)

© 2004 - 2021. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help