Content Join OGEMID
 
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Transnational Dispute Management

Skip navigation

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

Join OGEMID

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About TDM
    4. About TDM
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & r docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • Audiovisual library AV library
    1. Home
    2. Audiovisual library
    3. Audiovisual Library
    4. Audiovisual Library
    5. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    6. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    7. Conference presentations
    8. Conference presentations
  • OGEMID OGEMID
    1. Home
    2. OGEMID
    3. About OGEMID
    4. About OGEMID
    5. Suggest a topic
    6. Suggest a topic
    7. Guest programme
    8. Guest programme
    9. Seminar programme
    10. Seminar programme
    11. Browse archive
    12. Browse archive
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Join
    16. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

Nasib Hasanov v Georgia - ICSID Case No. ARB/20/44 - Decision on Respondent's Inter-State Negotiation Objection - 19 April 2022

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Azerbaijan
  • Georgia
Year

2022

Summary

Reproduced from www.worldbank.org/icsid with permission of ICSID.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction and Parties
II. Procedural Background
III. The Parties' Written and Oral Submissions
A. The Respondent's Inter-State Negotiation Objection
B. The Claimant's Opposition to the Inter-State Negotiation Objection
IV. The Tribunal's Analysis
A. Article 9 and Inter-State Negotiation
B. Admissibility or Jurisdiction
C. What Must be Done to Satisfy the Inter-State Negotiation Precondition?
D. Compliance with the Inter-State Negotiation Precondition
V. Decision

I. INTRODUCTION AND PARTIES

1. This case concerns a dispute submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID" or the "Centre") on the basis of the Agreement between the Government of Georgia and the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, which entered into force on July 10, 1996 (the "Azerbaijan-Georgia BIT" or the "BIT"), and the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, which entered into force on October 14, 1966 (the "ICSID Convention").

2. The claimant is Mr. Nasib Hasanov ("Mr. Hasanov" or the "Claimant"), a natural person having the nationality of Azerbaijan.

3. The respondent is Georgia ("Respondent" or "State" or "Georgia").

4. The Claimant and the Respondent are collectively referred to as the "Parties." The Parties' representatives and their addresses are listed above on page (i).

5. This Decision addresses the Respondent's objection to jurisdiction on the basis that the Claimant failed to satisfy the requirements of Articles 9(1) and (2) of the BIT, which, the Respondent argues, "conditions resort to international arbitration on prior negotiations between" the Georgian and Azerbaijani Governments, and the Claimant did not seek or initiate such negotiations (the "Inter-State Negotiation Objection")

6. The underlying dispute in this arbitration concerns the Claimant's status as the ultimate beneficial owner of Caucasus Online LLC ("CO"), a telecommunications company formed under the laws of Georgia. The Claimant explains that he "made and acquired his investment in CO" in January 2019 (the "Transaction").

According to the Claimant, CO is the sole owner of a submarine, fibre-optic cable under the Black Sea, by which it "transits internet traffic from Europe to the South Caucasus and Caspian region." The Georgian National Communications Commission ("GNCC"), a State administrative agency, authorizes CO's operations

7. The Claimant's position is that GNCC has (a) arbitrarily and illegitimately asserted a right to control and veto the Transaction by which Mr. Hasanov attained his CO beneficial ownership status; and (b) wrongfully taken retaliatory measures when the Claimant "insisted that the Transaction was unconstrained by the GNCC's overreaching attempt to regulate." The Claimant contends, in short, that the GNCC did not have the power to oblige CO to obtain the GNCC's "prior consent to any future change in the beneficial ownership of CO (rather than just for a change in direct shareholdings in CO, as required by the Communications Law)."3 Nonetheless, he and the "Seller" in the Transaction (Mr. Khvicha Makatsaria) kept the GNCC and the Georgian Government "fully informed of the potential change in beneficial ownership of CO."4

8. The Respondent's position in the underlying dispute is that the Claimant has attempted, "in plain defiance of the applicable admission requirements, to invest in and take over a company that has a dominant market position in a highly regulated industry and owns strategic infrastructure." The Respondent explains that "Georgian law requires notification to and prior approval by the" GNCC "of any proposed investment in a telecommunications company authorized by the GNCC that would result in a transfer, direct or indirect, of five percent or more of the ownership in the company." This notification requirement applies to CO, but the Claimant "never sought" the GNCC's prior approval "for any of the transactions that purported to transfer to him a 100 percent indirect, beneficial interest in CO."

Instead, the Claimant concealed this acquisition from the Georgian authorities

9. According to the Respondent, Mr. Hasanov willfully defied the GNCC's orders to comply with the law, which prompted the GNCC to issue administrative proceedings and an instruction to CO to eliminate its ownership violation.

However, the violation remained and the Claimant "continued to unlawfully interfere with CO's management." The GNCC therefore appointed a "special manager" for CO, pursuant to the Communications Law, on October 1, 2020, rather than suspend CO's authorization to operate. The latter option would have carried the risk of harming the economic interests of the State, as well as the "legitimate interests of authorized persons/licensees in the field of electronic communications, the consumers or the competitive environment in the market."6

10. The Parties' underlying dispute is briefly described by way of background. The issue that this Decision addresses, as identified above, is the Respondent's Inter-State Negotiation Objection. The Tribunal, per its previous ruling,7 considers this objection as a preliminary question.8 The Respondent contends that the Inter-State Negotiation Objection, if successful, would dispose of the entire case.9 The Claimant's position is that even if the objection were successful, it would not dispose of the entire case or of any of the Claimant's claims, because the Claimant would, "in line with an extensive line of jurisprudence, simply seek a stay of the proceedings and would make renewed attempts to initiate interstate negotiations before pursing the same claims with the same scope."10

...

V. DECISION

115. For the reasons set forth above, the Tribunal decides as follows:

(1) The Respondent's Inter-State Negotiation Objection is dismissed.

(2) On the question of costs, the Tribunal previously informed the Parties (November 26, 2021; see above, para. 38) that, consistent with the Parties' suggestion (May 3, 2021) and para. 22.2 of Procedural Order No. 1, the Tribunal will confer with the Parties regarding the date for costs submissions (limited to two pages of argument together with a summary of cots incurred).

[signed]

Stanimir Alexandrov
J. William Rowley
Laurence Shore

Footnotes omitted

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

TDM Call for Papers: National Courts as a Forum for the Resolution of Disputes under Article 26 Energy Charter Treaty

John P. Gaffney, Dr. iur Richard Happ,
Lucia Raimanova, Anna-Maria Tamminen, Dr. Catharine Titi

  • John P. Gaffney
  • Dr. iur Ricard Happ
  • Lucia Raimanova
  • Anna-Maria Tamminen
  • Dr. Catharine Titi

TDM Call for Papers: International Investment Arbitration - Environmental Protection and Climate Change Issues

Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman, Wendy J. Miles QC, Carla Lewis,
Dr Jane Willems, Dr Stephen Minas

  • Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman
  • Wendy J. Miles QC
  • Carla Lewis
  • Dr Jane Willems
  • Dr Stephen Minas

TDM Call for Papers: The Future of Investment Law in Latin America

Dr. Sébastien Manciaux and Francisco Victoria-Andreu

  • Sebastien Manciaux
  • Francisco Victoria-Andreu

TDM Call for Papers: Islamic Finance and Dispute Resolution

Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman

  • Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman

TDM Call for Papers: The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA)

J. Chaisse, J. Górski, E. Laryea, M.M. Mbengue, and K. Olaoye

  • Prof. Julien Chaisse
  • Dr. Jedrzej Gorski
  • Prof. Emmanuel Laryea
  • Prof. Makane Moïse Mbengue
  • Kehinde Olaoye
  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

New Frontiers in Asia-Pacific International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution - Book Review

1 Jul 2022

S. Dutta

  • S. Dutta

Forming Transnational Dispute Settlement Norms: Soft Law and the Role of UNCITRAL's Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific - Book Review

1 Jul 2022

S. Dutta

  • S. Dutta

From Protection to Facilitation Agreements: Contributions of The Pan-African Investment Code, the Brazilian Model, and the New Regional and Multilateral Foreign Investments Agreements

27 Jun 2022

T. Ferreira Almeida

  • T. Ferreira Almeida
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGEMID, the leading on-line discussion platform for international dispute resolution?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Transnational Dispute Management Journal (TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) and OGEMID listserv focus on recent developments in the area of (investment) arbitration and dispute management, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About TDM

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL)
  • Transnational Arbitration Observer (TAO)

© 2004 - 2022. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help