Legitimate Regulation vs Regulatory Expropriation in Public Infrastructure Investments after Azurix: A Case Study

F. Costamagna
Costamagna, Francesco

Article from: TDM 2 (2007), in Infrastructure Investment & Dispute Management

Introduction

Azurix v. Argentina represents the first case in which and international arbitral tribunal decided on the merit of a disputed water privatization. The dispute was brought about by the US-based water firm Azurix , which sought compensation for losses related to measures adopted by the Buenos Aires Province. The ICSID Tribunal was required to deal with a number of highly controversial issues. This comment focuses on the expropriation claim put forward by Azurix and it analyses the multi-factor approach adopted by the Tribunal to complement the international doctrine on ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

F. Costamagna; "Legitimate Regulation vs Regulatory Expropriation in Public Infrastructure Investments after Azurix: A Case Study"
TDM 2 (2007), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1000