An ICSID Tribunal Values Illegal Expropriation Damages from Date of the Award: What Does This Mean for Upcoming Expropriation Claims? A Case note and Commentary of ADC v. Hungary.

R.D. Deutsch
Deutsch, Richard D.

Article from: TDM 3 (2007), in Energy Litigation and Arbitration - Expert Perspectives

Introduction

In an award which marked an ICSID tribunal's rare finding of an illegal expropriation, the most unremarkable aspect was the expropriation ruling itself. The most brow-raising aspect was the tribunal's approach to damages following its decision that Hungary had violated the expropriation provision of the Agreement between the Government of the Hungarian People's Republic and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus on Mutual Promotion and Protection of Investment (the "Cyprus-Hungary BIT"). Until this decision, it had become typical in BIT claims that damages were valued ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

R.D. Deutsch; "An ICSID Tribunal Values Illegal Expropriation Damages from Date of the Award: What Does This Mean for Upcoming Expropriation Claims? A Case note and Commentary of ADC v. Hungary."
TDM 3 (2007), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1014