Substantive Review of ICSID Awards: Is the Desire for Accuracy Sufficient to Compromise Finality?

T.W. Walsh
Walsh, Thomas W.

Article from: TDM 5 (2007), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Introduction

The following analysis explores the significance of opening ICSID awards to appellate review, concluding that, although accuracy is a valid factor motivating the promotion of appeal, investors continue to prefer finality and so there is insufficient interest to compel the adoption of the Appeals Facility. Part I distinguishes appeals from the current standards of review available to international arbitration awards in ICSID and other jurisdictions. I begin by briefly defining the various levels of appellate review, differentiating between review of the legitimacy of the process ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

T.W. Walsh; "Substantive Review of ICSID Awards: Is the Desire for Accuracy Sufficient to Compromise Finality?"
TDM 5 (2007), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1072