Jurisdiction Over "Contract Claims" in Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration on the Basis of Wide Dispute Settlement Clauses in Investment Agreements

J. Griebel
Griebel, Jörn

Article from: TDM 5 (2007), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Introduction

In treaty-based investment arbitration (mostly proceedings based on bilateral investment treaties, BITs), the question is often raised whether arbitration tribunals enjoy jurisdiction regarding claims based on contractual relationships between an investor and his host state. Contrary to treaty claims, such as claims based on violations of the fair and equitable treatment standard or the duty to provide for full protection and security to investors, jurisdiction over contract claims specifically needs to be provided for in the investment treaty. Whether this is the case is of ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J. Griebel; "Jurisdiction Over "Contract Claims" in Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration on the Basis of Wide Dispute Settlement Clauses in Investment Agreements"
TDM 5 (2007), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1079