Bilateral Investment Treaties and Arbitration: An Argument and a Proposal for the ICSID's Implementation of a System of Binding Precedent

M.M. Rodgers
Rodgers, Marie-Louise M.

Article from: TDM 3 (2008), in Precedent in Investment Arbitration

Introduction

This paper proposes a solution to this complex problem by arguing that the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("the Centre") should implement a system where arbitral awards are given precendential value and create a separate appellate tribunal that will reconcile inconsistent decisions by determining the correct interpretation of the substantive provisions of the BIT. This paper, first, will describe the doctrine of precedent as it is used in the United States judicial system. Then, in Part VI, this paper will discuss the four arguments against ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M.M. Rodgers; "Bilateral Investment Treaties and Arbitration: An Argument and a Proposal for the ICSID's Implementation of a System of Binding Precedent"
TDM 3 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1242