Bias, the Right to Object and Waiver: The Problem With the Arbitration Act 1996

N. Craig
Craig, Nicholas

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

The decision in Reg v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [1] (the decision of the House of Lords following Lord Hoffman's failure to disclose his connection to Amnesty International) makes clear that even the most highly respected judges can make errors as regards disclosure of matters which might give the appearance of bias. The House of Lords decided that the previous decision should be set aside because a judge was automatically disqualified where he was involved in promoting the same cause as a party to the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

N. Craig; "Bias, the Right to Object and Waiver: The Problem With the Arbitration Act 1996"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1267