How Challenging Is the Challenge, or Can U.S. Courts Remove Arbitrators Before an Arbitration Has Come to an End? [updated September 2010]

Y. Andreeva
Andreeva, Yulia

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

"If you shoot at the king, you'd better not miss." Every lawyer must bear this wisdom in mind when deciding whether or not to challenge an arbitrator appointed to resolve, by means of a final and binding decision, a legal dispute. But the legal armory is strong, the facts command, and a coup d'etat against a tribunal or its members is not uncommon in arbitral practice. The challenge to bringing a challenge, however, is that the U.S. legal system does not supply reliable procedural means for disqualifying arbitrators after the arbitral process has begun and until it has ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

Y. Andreeva; "How Challenging Is the Challenge, or Can U.S. Courts Remove Arbitrators Before an Arbitration Has Come to an End? [updated September 2010]"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1277