Recent Developments U.S. Courts Treatment of Arbitrator Nondisclosure

H.M. Elul
Elul, Hagit Muriel

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

The Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), section 10(b), permits vacatur of an arbitral award where "there was evident partiality" in the arbitrator. There is considerable debate as to what constitutes "evident partiality," particularly in the context of the arbitrator's failure to make a disclosure of a relationship with the attorneys' representing one of the parties to the arbitration. The leading decision from the United States Supreme Court on the issue of arbitrator nondisclosure is Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v, Continental Cas . Co., 393 U.S. 145 (1968). In a ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

H.M. Elul; "Recent Developments U.S. Courts Treatment of Arbitrator Nondisclosure"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1278