At the Crossroads of Arbitrator Bias: What Path to Choose?

S. Grégoire
Grégoire, Simon
D. Grodinsky
Grodinsky, Daniel

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

An arbitrator's independence and impartiality are the conditions sine qua non of the exercise of his jurisdiction. If it is accepted that these conditions apply to judges of courts of justice, they who are generally subject to the supervision of an appellate court, such independence and impartiality is even more important in regards to those whose decisions are not subject to such supervision.[1] While the independence and impartiality of an arbitrator is equally, if not more important that that of a judge, the latter, by the nature of his functions, is better sheltered ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Grégoire; D. Grodinsky; "At the Crossroads of Arbitrator Bias: What Path to Choose?"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1280