Is there a different yardstick for arbitrator bias in investment treaty arbitrations?

N. Peter
Peter, Natasha
C. Lemarié
Lemarié, C.

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

A significant increase in the number, and media prominence, of investment treaty arbitrations in the last decade has resulted in heated debate about how these cases should be run, regulated and publicised. There have been calls for a greater degree of transparency, and suggestions that investment cases should be treated as more akin to judicial than arbitral proceedings . These issues have also been raised in the course of the reform of various key arbitral instruments, such as the amendment in 2006 of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

N. Peter; C. Lemarié; "Is there a different yardstick for arbitrator bias in investment treaty arbitrations?"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1287