Impartiality v. Substantive Neutrality: Is the Mediator Authorized to Provide Legal Advice?

M. Azeredo da Silveira
Azeredo da Silveira, Mercédeh

Article from: TDM 4 (2008), in Arbitrator Bias

Introduction

A sine qua non of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is the parties' right to self-determination, which in mediation involves the ability to select the mediator and decide whether to agree to a settlement of all or some of the disputed issues. Mediators, lawyers and scholars agree that compliance with the mediator's duty to remain impartial during and after mediation is crucial both for the process to succeed and the parties' rights to be protected. By complying with the duty to remain impartial, the mediator contributes to the betterment of the practice of mediation. As one ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M. Azeredo da Silveira; "Impartiality v. Substantive Neutrality: Is the Mediator Authorized to Provide Legal Advice?"
TDM 4 (2008), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1293