ICSID Jurisprudence: Between Homogeneity and Heterogeneity A Call for Appeal?

A. Tsatsos
Tsatsos, Aristidis

Article from: TDM 1 (2009), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Summary

The settlement of investment disputes within the ICSID system is carried out by the ICSID arbitral tribunals which are non-permanent judicial bodies. Every separate case is adjudicated by a different ICSID panel. The only remedy available to set aside an ICSID award is the annulment procedure pursuant to Article 52 which concerns only the legitimacy of the process of decision. Moreover, the possibility of appeal of an arbitral award is explicitly excluded within the ICSID system. The limited scope of review pursuant to article 52 as well as the explicit exclusion of appeal intend ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A. Tsatsos; "ICSID Jurisprudence: Between Homogeneity and Heterogeneity A Call for Appeal?"
TDM 1 (2009), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1360