Testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on the "Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007"

P.B. Rutledge
Rutledge, Peter Bowman

Article from: TDM 1 (2009), in Roundup of Articles

Introduction

Main points of this testimony: First, too much of the debate in this field has been dominated by anecdote, not data. The available empirical data on arbitration is growing, and, in important respects, either is inconsistent with or flatly contradicts, some of the anecdotes that appear to be driving the debate over arbitration reform. It is important to fill the gaps in the empirical record, before knowing whether and to what extent legislative action is necessary; Second, several of the findings upon which H.R. 3010 rests, found in Section 2 of the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

P.B. Rutledge; "Testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on the "Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007""
TDM 1 (2009), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1381