Is the European Court of Human Rights an Alternative to Investor-State Arbitration?

U. Kriebaum
Kriebaum, Ursula

Article from: TDM 1 (2009), in Human Rights

Introduction

In 1986 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for the first time decided a case concerning an interference with property rights of a foreigner ( Agosi v. United Kingdom ).[1] Yet, it was only in the new millennium that cases of foreign investors containing facts typical for investment arbitration have been decided by the European Court of Human Rights.[2] In a few cases investors opted for parallel proceedings before arbitral tribunals and the European Court of Human Rights.[3] Therefore the question arises: are the international mechanisms for the protection of human ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

U. Kriebaum; "Is the European Court of Human Rights an Alternative to Investor-State Arbitration?"
TDM 1 (2009), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1436