Replacement of a Deceased or Disabled Arbitrator: Is American Law Out of Step?

M.J. Goldstein
Goldstein, Marc J.

Article from: TDM 1 (2010), in Procedure, Advocacy, Strategy and Tactics in Arbitration

Summary

Contemporary international arbitration rules generally provide for the replacement of an arbitrator who becomes deceased or resigns due to illness during the proceedings, and the extent to which proceedings must be repeated is, under these rules, generally left to the discretion of the reconstituted Tribunal. But United States law, particularly in the influential federal Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, generally holds that such resignation of a party-appointed arbitrator requires a new start before a new tribunal. In this article, Marc Goldstein discusses a recent ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M.J. Goldstein; "Replacement of a Deceased or Disabled Arbitrator: Is American Law Out of Step?"
TDM 1 (2010), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1524