The Federal Arbitration Act and Its Impact on State Arbitration Laws

C.R. Drahozal
Drahozal, Christopher R.

Article from: TDM 1 (2010), in Roundup of Articles

Introduction

In Southland Corp. v. Keating , the United States Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) applies in state court and preempts conflicting state laws. 465 U.S. 1, 16 (1984). Southland has proven to be a controversial decision, both because of its analysis (or lack thereof) of the legislative history of the FAA and because of its restrictive effect on the power of states to regulate arbitration. E.g. , id. at 25-28, 35 (O'Connor, J., dissenting). Nonetheless, the Court has "repeatedly reaffirmed" Southland , and has ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

C.R. Drahozal; "The Federal Arbitration Act and Its Impact on State Arbitration Laws"
TDM 1 (2010), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1551