Pushing the Boundaries vs Striking a Balance: Some Reflections on Stabilization Issues in Light of Duke Energy International Investments v. Republic of Peru

L. Cotula
Cotula, Lorenzo

Article from: TDM 1 (2010), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

This short note discusses a recent ICSID award that found a breach of a tax stabilization commitment made by the government of Peru to a foreign investor through a set of "Legal Stability Agreements".[1] As Duke v. Peru is the first published award on stabilization commitments since the 1980s, the reasoning of the tribunal is of particular interest. The note places the award within the broader context of ongoing debates on stabilization; discusses facts and key findings of the case; analyses the tribunal's reasoning on stabilization commitments, and ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

L. Cotula; "Pushing the Boundaries vs Striking a Balance: Some Reflections on Stabilization Issues in Light of Duke Energy International Investments v. Republic of Peru"
TDM 1 (2010), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1571