US Supreme Court Hears Argument on Bias Standard for Elected US State Court Judges (Caperton v. AT Massey)

Article from: TDM 1 (2010), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

Mark Kantor on OGEMID: The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument on March 3rd 2009 in the case of Caperton v. AT Massey, addressing whether the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution sets a bias standard for judges in U.S. State courts. If petitioners succeed in the case, the decision could prevent an elected State court judge from sitting in a dispute where one of the litigants contributed to that judge's election campaign. As explained below, this case also has indirect implications for the conflicts standard applicable to arbitrators in the U.S. Caperton v. AT ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

"US Supreme Court Hears Argument on Bias Standard for Elected US State Court Judges (Caperton v. AT Massey)"
TDM 1 (2010), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1580