On the Right Track? State Immunity in China and Hong Kong in light of the China Railways Case

C. Hassall
Hassall, Cameron
C. Yates
Yates, Christopher
J. Chu
Chu, Joseph
A. Crockett
Crockett, Antony

Article from: TDM 4 (2010), in China

Introduction

Until the early 20th century, common law and civil jurisdictions alike applied a doctrine of absolute immunity. According to this doctrine, foreign States were completely immune from the jurisdiction of municipal courts in accordance with the maxim par in parem non habet imperium (one sovereign is not subject to the jurisdiction of another) unless they consented to jurisdiction. The increasing participation of States in international trade and commerce triggered a move towards a more restrictive approach. According to the doctrine of restrictive immunity, States would only be ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

C. Hassall; C. Yates; J. Chu; A. Crockett; "On the Right Track? State Immunity in China and Hong Kong in light of the China Railways Case"
TDM 4 (2010), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1643