Cultural Differences in Advocacy in International Arbitration

J. Paulsson
Paulsson, Jan

Article from: TDM 1 (2011), in Procedure, Advocacy, Strategy and Tactics in Arbitration

Introduction

If you want to observe a real clash of cultures, one might be tempted to say, it is hard to find more sound and fury than what emerges when rival French lawyers appear on both sides, or rival Londoners on both sides, or Cairenes or New Yorkers! For then, it often seems, the combatants leave no prisoners, and urge vehemently that starkly different procedural arrangements be adopted, each camp insisting all the while that what they seek is but the normal course of well-ordered events. Their opponents, of course, are the ones attempting to mislead the tribunal with self-serving requests ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J. Paulsson; "Cultural Differences in Advocacy in International Arbitration"
TDM 1 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1649