Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Agreement to Arbitrate Between Investor and Host State in the Eyes of State Courts

A.M. Steingruber
Steingruber, Andrea Marco

Article from: TDM 1 (2011), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Abstract

Unlike ICSID awards, which are subject only to the ICSID annulment procedure and therefore cannot be challenged before local courts, non-ICSID investment treaty arbitration awards raise the possibility of intervention by local courts at the place of arbitration. The challenges to investment arbitration awards are, in these cases, raised in accordance with a national arbitration law. The purpose of this paper is limited to briefly discussing how the agreement to arbitrate between the host State and the investor is viewed by English and Swiss state courts. The reason why such a ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A.M. Steingruber; "Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Agreement to Arbitrate Between Investor and Host State in the Eyes of State Courts"
TDM 1 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1654