Can a State claim expropriation under a BIT following the successful enforcement of a foreign (commercial) award against its assets abroad? - The Paris Court of Appeal judgment of 18 November 2010 in Région de Kaliningrad (Russie) v Lituanie

S. Nappert
Nappert, Sophie

Article from: TDM 2 (2011), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

This case presents the interesting and (at least to my knowledge) unprecedented question of whether a claim in expropriation lies in favour of a State whose assets were seized and sold in satisfaction of a (commercial) New York Convention award against the State where the assets are located. In this case, Duke Investments Ltd, hailing from Cyprus, secured in 2004 an LCIA award in its favour against the Region of Kaliningrad (Russian territorial collectivity) for the reimbursement of a debt. In 2006, Duke obtained the enforcement of the award against assets belonging ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Nappert; "Can a State claim expropriation under a BIT following the successful enforcement of a foreign (commercial) award against its assets abroad? - The Paris Court of Appeal judgment of 18 November 2010 in Région de Kaliningrad (Russie) v Lituanie"
TDM 2 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1713