MFN and Procedural Rights: Solutions from WTO Experience?

W. Ben Hamida
Ben Hamida, Walid

Article from: TDM 3 (2011), in Intersections: Dissemblance or Convergence between International Trade and Investment Law

Introduction

The application of the MFN Clause to the mechanisms of settlement of disputes is a controversial question. The problem arose in particular in investment arbitration. The majority of investment treaties comprise MFN clauses written in a broad way, and do not contain any provisions on the inclusion or the exclusion of investor-State arbitration in the scope of the clause. The question therefore is whether in the presence of such clauses, an investor can rely on the more favourable dispute settlement provisions accepted in other investment treaties. When the basic treaty contains no dispute ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

W. Ben Hamida; "MFN and Procedural Rights: Solutions from WTO Experience?"
TDM 3 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1728