Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

D. Wen
Wen, Dai
L. Bergman
Bergman, Linn

Article from: TDM 5 (2011), in Resolving International Business Disputes by ADR in Asia

Introduction

The rules of the SCC and the CIETAC are similar in many ways. Both rules respect party autonomy, and are flexible to be modified by agreement between the parties. Under both sets of rules, the arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration in a manner as it considers appropriate (SCC Article 19 and CIETAC Article 29). The structure and the wording of both sets of rules are also similar. Both rules reflect to a certain extent the law of the country where the respective institution has its seat although this is truer for the CIETAC Rules than the SCC Rules. While the Swedish ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

D. Wen; L. Bergman; "Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration"
TDM 5 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1753