The Legacy of Three Rivers in Non-Adversarial Arbitral Proceedings

S. Nappert
Nappert, Sophie
S. Blyth
Blyth, Simon

Article from: TDM 3 (2004), in International Commercial Arbitration

Introduction

The recent decisions in Three Rivers v the Bank of England (arising out of the collapse of BCCI) provide food for thought as regards the protection afforded by the doctrine of legal professional privilege in the field of arbitration. Potential implications derive, in principal, from two statements of law. First, Lord Justice Longmore's interpretation of the House of Lords' decision in Re L (A Minor) (Police Investigation: Privilege) (1997) 1 A.C. 16 , as stating that "litigation privilege cannot exist in the context of non-adversarial proceedings": Three ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Nappert; S. Blyth; "The Legacy of Three Rivers in Non-Adversarial Arbitral Proceedings"
TDM 3 (2004), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=176