ASEAN IIAs: Conserving Regulatory Sovereignty While Promoting the Rule of Law?

M. Ewing-Chow
Ewing-Chow, Michael
G.R. Fischer
Fischer, Geraldine Rebeca

Article from: TDM 5 (2011), in Resolving International Business Disputes by ADR in Asia

Investment flows have altered in just the last few years.

Traditionally, some have viewed the investment paradigm as a divide between developed (capital exporting) and developing (capital importing) countries. This view is evident in Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen's dissent in the Malaysia Historical Salvors v. Malaysia Annulment Decision where he notes that the question that separates him from the majority is "whether a contribution to the economic development of the host State is a condition of an ICSID 'investment'." In his opinion, ICSID jurisdiction was not meant to be solely dependent on the will of the parties but rather the will of the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M. Ewing-Chow; G.R. Fischer; "ASEAN IIAs: Conserving Regulatory Sovereignty While Promoting the Rule of Law?"
TDM 5 (2011), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1769