Advantages and Disadvantages of arbitrating CIS disputes in Western Europe

A. Milner
Milner, Alexander
R. D
D'Cruz, Rupert

Article from: TDM 3 (2012), in Russian and CIS Arbitration Network (RCAN) Supplement

Introduction

As discussed in the second half of this article (and as the majority of practitioners and scholars in this field will know) many CIS countries have made major strides in recent years to establish themselves as jurisdictions conducive to international commercial arbitration. These developments are, of course, greatly to be welcomed. Nevertheless, there are various reasons why commercial parties with business interests in the CIS would still be better advised to continue to arbitrate substantial disputes in traditionally favoured Western European jurisdictions, at least for the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A. Milner; R. D'Cruz; "Advantages and Disadvantages of arbitrating CIS disputes in Western Europe"
TDM 3 (2012), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1805