Confidentiality vs Transparency in International Arbitration: The English Perspective

R. Gerbay
Gerbay, Rémy

Article from: TDM 3 (2012), in Confidentiality in Arbitration

Introduction

Confidentiality is often stated to be a key reason why businesses choose to arbitrate rather than litigate. In a recent survey of in-house counsel conducted by the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary University in London, 84% of those surveyed admitted to choosing arbitration at least in part because of its " confidentiality ". This is not surprising if one considers how widespread is the misconception that arbitration proceedings are automatically confidential. According to the aforementioned survey, over 50% of interviewees believe that arbitration ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

R. Gerbay; "Confidentiality vs Transparency in International Arbitration: The English Perspective"
TDM 3 (2012), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1816