Consumer Product Safety Regulation and Investor-State Arbitration Policy and Practice after Philip Morris Asia v Australia

L. Nottage
Nottage, Luke

Article from: TDM 5 (2012), in Legal Issues in Tobacco Control

Abstract

This article locates the Philip Morris Asia v Australia arbitration proceeding, initiated in 2011, in the context of broader policy and political debates. Part 1 briefly outlines Australia's investment treaty framework, suggesting that while the Hong Kong based investor may have a viable claim for expropriation or other violations of a 1993 treaty, Australia also has a viable defence for introducing tobacco plain packaging legislation. This 'hard case' therefore may join other 'great cases' in generating 'bad law' - namely the Australian Government's announcement in April 2011 that it ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

L. Nottage; "Consumer Product Safety Regulation and Investor-State Arbitration Policy and Practice after Philip Morris Asia v Australia"
TDM 5 (2012), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1880