Back to the Eternal Debate of MFN and Dispute Settlement: A Case Comment on ICS v. Republic of Argentina

A. Martin
Martin, Antoine

Article from: TDM 7 (2012), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) clauses and their possible extension to dispute settlement mechanisms are at the heart of a significant debate in international investments law. This debate is very lively but it is currently unsettled, as demonstrated by persisting disagreements between opposite Schools of thoughts and multiple inconsistencies in arbitral decisions. MFN clauses were reconsidered recently following a claim brought by ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited against Argentina before the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). The PCA arbitrators rendered a decision ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A. Martin; "Back to the Eternal Debate of MFN and Dispute Settlement: A Case Comment on ICS v. Republic of Argentina"
TDM 7 (2012), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1905