The Conventionality Control of Investment Arbitrations: Enhancing Coherence Through Dialogue

J.P. Bohoslavsky
Bohoslavsky, Juan Pablo
J.B. Justo
Justo, Juan Bautista

Article from: TDM 1 (2013), in Human Rights

Conflicts between human rights and foreign investors' rights

The simultaneous submission of a state to the international human rights systems and foreign investment regimes can generate a dilemma for governments, which becomes tangible when subjected to claims from those two fronts: either the state is liable for not taking the measures that are required by human rights covenants, or it does so by taking such actions and thus, affecting the interests of investors. To some extent, this dilemma corresponds to a practice of arbitral tribunals that are responsible for interpreting and applying the Bilateral Investment ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J.P. Bohoslavsky; J.B. Justo; "The Conventionality Control of Investment Arbitrations: Enhancing Coherence Through Dialogue"
TDM 1 (2013), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1932