Host-State Counterclaims: A Remedy for Fraud or Corruption in Investment-Treaty Arbitration?

S. Dudas
Dudas, Stefan
N. Tsolakidis
Tsolakidis, Nikolaos

Article from: TDM 3 (2013), in Corruption and Arbitration

Abstract

The impressive growth of investment treaty arbitration and the almost unanimous acceptance of arbitration as a mechanism for settlement of international disputes have led to talks about the so-called golden age of arbitration. However, not everything in the garden is lovely. There is a clear imbalance with respect to the legal remedies available to the parties. While the investor has clearly moved away from the aged system of diplomatic protection, host-States seem to have been left behind, without any real remedies against abusive or corrupted behaviour on behalf of the investor. This ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Dudas; N. Tsolakidis; "Host-State Counterclaims: A Remedy for Fraud or Corruption in Investment-Treaty Arbitration?"
TDM 3 (2013), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1962