Commercial Arbitration and Corrupt Practices: Should Arbitrators Be Bound By A Duty to Report Corrupt Practices?

S. Nadeau-Séguin
Nadeau-Séguin, Sara

Article from: TDM 3 (2013), in Corruption and Arbitration

Introduction

The figures recently released by Transparency International (TPI) are a harsh reminder that corruption remains a problem around the world, even in countries where we would not expect it. Two thirds of the 176 countries ranked in the 2012 Corruption Perception Index score below 50, on a scale from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean). Paradoxically, the public outcry condemning corruption has never been more pronounced. Arbitration awkwardly stands at the confluence of these two trends. Anecdotal evidence suggests that international commercial ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Nadeau-Séguin; "Commercial Arbitration and Corrupt Practices: Should Arbitrators Be Bound By A Duty to Report Corrupt Practices?"
TDM 3 (2013), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1963