On the Divide Between Investor-State Arbitration and the Global Fight Against Corruption

D. Litwin
Litwin, Daniel

Article from: TDM 3 (2013), in Corruption and Arbitration

Introduction

Transnational corruption, understood as the corrupt exchanges between public officials and foreign business interests, has recently garnered significant national and international attention. In the span of sixteen-years, states have adopted a myriad of international conventions and treaties criminalizing corrupt behavior. This corruption "norm cascade" has been met alongside developments in investor-state arbitration where allegations of corruption are becoming increasingly common. When used as a defense by host states, these allegations can have a significant impact on ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

D. Litwin; "On the Divide Between Investor-State Arbitration and the Global Fight Against Corruption"
TDM 3 (2013), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1964