Arbitrator and Counsel: the Double-Hat Dilemma

R. Berzero, Esq.
Berzero, Esq., Roberta
G.J. Horvath
Horvath, Günther J.

Article from: TDM 4 (2013), in Ten years of Transnational Dispute Management (TDM)

Introduction

A topic really hotly debated in recent time is the so called "double-hat syndrome", the question of the propriety of lawyers acting as counsel and arbitrator in cases that raise largely the same or similar legal issues. The relevance of this topic can be felt even more if one considers that no ethical code of conduct exists for lawyers and arbitrators acting in arbitral proceedings. In this article, the authors will point out the main areas of debate, present the state of the art and propose some possible approaches to deal with the dilemma in exam. Particularly, Section 1 ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

R. Berzero, Esq.; G.J. Horvath; "Arbitrator and Counsel: the Double-Hat Dilemma"
TDM 4 (2013), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1985