Assessing Treaty-based Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Abandon, Retain or Reform?

C.T. Campbell
Campbell, Christian Tyler
S. Nappert
Nappert, Sophie
L. Nottage
Nottage, Luke

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Abstract

[Note: revised version 23/01/2014] As a constructive contribution to the OECD's Freedom of Investment (FOI) Roundtable Public consultation held from 16 May - 23 July 2012, the authors created an online form asking for views on whether ISDS should be left as is, abandoned completely, or adapted in various listed ways. This article summarizes the responses received, noting strong support for investor-State mediation, greater transparency and measures to reduce delay and cost, and less interest in other possible reforms.

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

C.T. Campbell; S. Nappert; L. Nottage; "Assessing Treaty-based Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Abandon, Retain or Reform?"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2024