Africa and the System of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: To Reject or Not to Reject?

U. Ewelukwa Ofodile
Ewelukwa Ofodile, Uché

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Abstract

This paper examines the position of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) regarding proposals to reform the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) system. Despite their silence on ongoing discussions about the future of the ISDS system and possible pathways for reform, SSA countries are making their position on the issue known. The paper argues that the position of SSA countries can be gleaned from instruments that these countries have pushed for at the sub-regional level. In particular, in the Investment Agreement for the COMESA Common Investment Area (CCIA), in the SADC Bilateral ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

U. Ewelukwa Ofodile; "Africa and the System of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: To Reject or Not to Reject?"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2043