Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration 'on Track': The Role of States Parties

T. Ishikawa
Ishikawa, Tomoko

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

Recent investment arbitration cases suggest a tendency towards an ever-broader subject-matter jurisdiction of tribunals over disputes between investors and the host state. Firstly, in a series of cases bearing on government debts/debts of a state owned enterprise, tribunals confirmed that security entitlements deriving from sovereign bonds, and rights under derivative contracts, fall within the scope of an 'investment' covered both by Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention and the relevant investment treaties: Abaclat v. Argentina , Ambiente v. Argentina and Deutsche ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

T. Ishikawa; "Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration 'on Track': The Role of States Parties"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2048