Restricting the Scope of International Investment Agreements as a Means to Set Limits to the Extent of Arbitral Jurisdiction

M. Valenti
Valenti, Mara

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) has been one of the major achievements of international law, especially if one looks at it from the perspective of the status of the individual according to international law. The power to initiate an arbitral proceeding directly against the host State has become a strong tool in the hands of foreign investors around the world. In the field of the protection of human rights, we may find a similar right of access to an international jurisdiction. Yet such a right remains subject to certain conditions, which highlight the traditional ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M. Valenti; "Restricting the Scope of International Investment Agreements as a Means to Set Limits to the Extent of Arbitral Jurisdiction"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2056