Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States

A. Roberts
Roberts, Anthea

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

Part I sets out the theoretical framework, examining the nature of investment treaties, the interpretive balance of power between treaty parties and tribunals, and the likelihood of stra- tegic interactions between these actors. Part II turns to legal doctrine to consider how analysis of subsequent agreements and practice can help treaty parties and tribunals to engage in a con- structive dialogue about interpretation. It examines why and how this evidence is applied in public international law, including human rights law, so as to develop a theory about its use and its limits in the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A. Roberts; "Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2062