ICSID Annulment Standards: Who Has Finally Won the Reisman vs Broches Debate of Two Decades Ago?

N. Tsolakidis
Tsolakidis, Nikolaos

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Abstract

From the very first cases, Klöckner I and Amco I, prominent scholars and practitioners have debated and commented the scope of Article 52 and its actual application by ad hoc Committees. The debate continues. In fact, ICSID itself recently released a background paper on its annulment process in response to a request by the Solicitor General of the Philippines. This essay will reengage with the spirited debate between Professor Michael Reisman and Aaron Broches of two decades ago. It will try to assess, by reference to subsequent decided cases, which analysis has been ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

N. Tsolakidis; "ICSID Annulment Standards: Who Has Finally Won the Reisman vs Broches Debate of Two Decades Ago?"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2069