ICSID Annulment Reform: Are We Looking at the Right Problem?

M.B. Silberman
Silberman, Mallory B.

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

Professor Schreuer noted in 2009, "[i]n every published annulment decision to date, ad hoc committees have stressed th[e] distinction [between annulment and appeal]. They have stated repeatedly that their functions are limited and that they do not have the powers of a court of appeal . . . . Committees have insisted that a decision to annul had to be based on one of the five reasons listed in Article 52(1) and they could not review the awards' findings for errors of fact or law." Committees also have stressed the importance of evaluating each claim against the particular Article 52(1) ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M.B. Silberman; "ICSID Annulment Reform: Are We Looking at the Right Problem?"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2070