The trembling legitimacy of the ICSID annulment system in the light of decisions by Ad Hoc Committees vis-à-vis the Ad Hoc Committee decisions

V. Giraud Martinelli
Giraud Martinelli, Vanessa

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

Since 2001 there has been a considerable increase in annulment proceedings. According to the ICSID Convention, the annulment is an extraordinary remedy designed for a limited scope of review of five specific grounds provided under Article 52 of the ICSID Convention, which sets the general procedural framework for annulment proceedings. The Ad Hoc Committees are intended to review solely the arguments for annulment filed by the petitioning party and must only decide on aspects of five specific grounds of the Tribunal award. However, the extensive interpretations of Ad Hoc Committees are ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

V. Giraud Martinelli; "The trembling legitimacy of the ICSID annulment system in the light of decisions by Ad Hoc Committees vis-à-vis the Ad Hoc Committee decisions"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2071