Interim Costs Orders: The Tribunal's Tool to Encourage Procedural Economy

J. Sullivan KC
Sullivan KC, Jeffrey
D. Ingle
Ingle, David

Article from: TDM 1 (2014), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

One of the chief complaints of investment arbitration is that it has become a slow and expensive process. It often requires States to expend huge sums defending frivolous claims and, even when it has won a case, a respondent State may consider it to be something of a pyrrhic victory after the vast legal fees and the huge administrative burden have been taken into account. Equally, claimants that have been unfairly treated by governments have no option but to spend millions in legal fees (and wait many years) to obtain a remedy, often in face of a State party that seeks delay at every ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J. Sullivan KC; D. Ingle; "Interim Costs Orders: The Tribunal's Tool to Encourage Procedural Economy"
TDM 1 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2087