Opting Out of ICSID and BITs: Legal and Economic Effects

L. Burger
Burger, Laurence
J. Nicholson
Nicholson, James

Article from: TDM 3 (2014), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Summary

In the last decade, the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") has become much more visible due to it administering a rising number of arbitrations. Whereas there were only a handful of investor-state arbitration cases in the 1980s and early 1990s, by 2012 the cumulative figure had risen to 419. Over 77% of these cases were initiated from 2002 onwards. Yet, several countries have recently decided to denounce the ICSID Convention and terminate Bilateral Investment Treaties ("BITs"). The purpose of this article was initially to review the countries ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

L. Burger; J. Nicholson; "Opting Out of ICSID and BITs: Legal and Economic Effects"
TDM 3 (2014), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2121