Non-Lawyer Arbitrators and the Deliberative Balance of International Arbitral Tribunals

E.E. Triantafilou
Triantafilou, Epaminontas E.

Article from: TDM 2 (2017), in Non-Legal Adjudicators in National and International Disputes

Introduction

One of the key advantages of arbitration over traditional adjudication is party autonomy: the parties can choose who will hear and resolve their dispute. This choice often, but not always, includes discretion to appoint a non-lawyer as arbitrator. This paper conducts a summary exploration of the potential effects of appointing non-lawyers as arbitrators in three-member international tribunals that are "mixed", i.e., include one or more lawyers as arbitrators. In this context, "non-lawyer" will be treated as synonymous with "technical expert", as the presence of a layperson on a tribunal ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

E.E. Triantafilou; "Non-Lawyer Arbitrators and the Deliberative Balance of International Arbitral Tribunals"
TDM 2 (2017), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2447